Ecological redlines provide a mechanism to maximize conservation gains in Mainland Southeast Asia
| 论文编号: | |||||||||
| 作者: | Bai Y | ||||||||
| 刊物名称: | One Earth | ||||||||
| 所属学科: | |||||||||
| 论文题目英文: | Ecological redlines provide a mechanism to maximize conservation gains in Mainland Southeast Asia | ||||||||
| 年: | Oct 2021 | ||||||||
| 卷: | 4 | ||||||||
| 期: | |||||||||
| 页: | 1–14 | ||||||||
| 联系作者: | Bai Y; Hughes AC | ||||||||
| 收录类别: | |||||||||
| 影响因子: | |||||||||
| 参与作者: | |||||||||
| 备注: | |||||||||
| 摘要: | Developing effective targets for conservation remains a topic of global debate. Ambitious targets for 50% or more of the Earth’s land surface have been proposed, yet balancing human needs with area-based conservation measures remains challenging. Current global conservation targets focus on biodiversity conservation, ignoring ecosystem services and vulnerabilities. Using China's ecological conservation redline as a basis, here we put forward a framework that combines ecosystem services, ecological sensitivity, and biodiversity indicators (including 10,311 species) to determine ecological priorities across Mainland Southeast Asia (M-SEA). We find that, based on the redline 15.8% of the M-SEA's land would cover all overlaps between biodiversity, service provision, and sensitivity hotspots, and much is already protected. Following this, 32.9% would cover all areas with at least hotspots for two priority facets, and 51% for all priorities. These targets are in line with those proposed in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework to maximize effectiveness of proposed targets. | ||||||||
| 论文下载: | 下载地址 | ||||||||
| |||||||||
